Super Lawyers - Badge
Illinois State Bar Association - Badge
Justia 10 - Badge
Million Dollar Advocates Forum - Badge
Avvo Rating 10 / Jonathan Rosenfeld / Top Attorney - Badges
Accredited Business / BBB / A+ - Badge

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers

Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers LLC Team

Hernia mesh lawsuits focus on injuries caused by defective devices that can lead to serious complications like chronic pain, infections, or the need for additional surgery. If you feel you’ve been harmed by a faulty mesh, Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers can guide you through the legal process and fight for the compensation you need.

We have a strong track record of advocating for victims of defective medical devices, including hernia mesh implants. With more than 25 years of experience, we know how to investigate claims thoroughly, collect credible evidence, and negotiate aggressively with manufacturers or insurance companies.

If you need help with a hernia mesh lawsuit, our defective medical device lawyers in Chicago are ready to help you recover compensation.

Status of the Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

As of February 8th, 2024, three hernia mesh device lawsuits have proceeded to trial, with over 20,000 pending cases still remaining. A fourth trial was supposed to take place, but the court decided against it and canceled it, given the cost and time expended on the first three trials.

This decision is based on the observation that previous trials involved different devices and legal questions, and an additional trial on a distinct device wouldn’t significantly affect existing fundamental issues. The court’s goal behind this strategy is to encourage hernia mesh settlement negotiations.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Updates

Staying informed about the latest developments in hernia mesh litigation is crucial if you or a loved one has been affected by these products. See below for some of the latest updates.

2025

February 5

A new hernia mesh lawsuit in Contra Costa County, California, alleges that a defective Covidien ProGrip mesh implant caused severe injuries like mesh failure, nerve damage, and chronic pain. The plaintiff is seeking both compensatory and punitive damages, accusing the defendants of negligence, fraudulent concealment, and medical malpractice.

February 3

As of now, the Bard MDL has 24,102 pending cases, while the Covidien MDL has 1,660 cases, and the Atrium and Ethicon Physiomesh MDLs are winding down.

January 8

The Covidien hernia mesh litigation is proceeding with new Case Management Orders for 2025 that set deadlines for discovery, expert reports, and bellwether trial selection. Trials are expected to start in late 2025 or early 2026, with Covidien cases potentially resulting in higher hernia mesh settlement amounts due to the severity of injuries.

2024

December 16

The judge has approved a Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) for managing hernia mesh settlements in the Bard hernia mesh lawsuits, ensuring that the settlement payments are distributed efficiently and transparently.

November 21

CMO #55 establishes an Intensive Settlement Process (ISP) with Special Masters overseeing settlement negotiations and mediations beginning in January 2027 and possibly lasting until 2029, which may delay resolutions for plaintiffs.

November 13

Settlement details for the Bard MDL include a Quick Pay option for simpler, straightforward cases offering $25,000, while payouts for more complex cases will depend on the severity of the injury. Removing claims with lower values from the pool is expected to increase the average payout for complex cases, although final payments may take 2 to 4 years.

November 5

Ethicon has quietly settled with 10 additional plaintiffs in hernia mesh lawsuits. The company continues to reduce the case count without disclosing the hernia mesh settlement amounts. All cases have been dismissed with prejudice, which means they cannot be reopened.

October 9

Plaintiffs are frustrated by the limited public details about the Bard hernia mesh settlement. Rumors suggest that the average payout is around $65,000, and the settlement period could last up to five years.

October 2

Becton Dickinson, the parent company of Bard, announced a settlement to resolve most hernia lawsuits in the MDL and Rhode Island state court. Although BD denies any wrongdoing, plaintiffs should still receive compensation, with potential settlements estimated between $50,000 and $100,000 based on a settlement matrix.

October 1

Over 100 new Bard hernia mesh lawsuits were filed, raising the total in the Bard MDL to 23,641. The Covidien MDL saw 41 new cases, increasing its total to 1,511 pending cases.

September 26

The Covidien hernia mesh MDL now has nearly 1,500 pending lawsuits. Plaintiffs are actively deposing Covidien corporate representatives, while the Bard MDL is stalled, leaving plaintiffs frustrated still.

September 17

Judge Sargus denied a plaintiff’s motion to remand cases back to district court due to an ongoing limited stay. This decision has left many plaintiffs frustrated with the slow pace of hernia mesh settlement negotiations.

September 10

A new hernia mesh lawsuit filed by a Florida man in the Covidien MDL claims that his Parietex ProGrip mesh, implanted in 2017 and 2021, caused complications that required him to undergo corrective surgery.

September 5

A plaintiff’s family requested that their case be remanded back to the District of Arizona for a faster resolution due to frustration with the long hernia mesh settlement process and the declining health condition of a loved one.

September 3

The Covidien MDL now has almost 1,500 pending cases. The Bard MDL has more than 24,000. New cases continue to be filed in both MDLs.

August 1

There are case management orders for the Bard settlement, but no actual settlement has been reached, leading to frustration. Negotiations may be close, but details still need to be finalized before cases are potentially remanded back to local federal courts.

July 6

Judge Edmund A. Sargus Jr. approved two case management orders in the Bard hernia mesh MDL. One of them—CMO 52—halts most activities, like discovery and motions, unless a plaintiff actively opts out of the proposed global settlement, at which point the stay is lifted. The second order—CMO 53—details how to proceed with opting out.

These orders lay the groundwork for the settlement, but full details of the MSA have not been released yet.

July 1

The Bard hernia mesh MDL saw a surge in new cases, with 745 new lawsuits filed in June, bringing the total to 23,641. This is probably due to anticipation of an impending settlement.

June 27

There has been little progress or media coverage regarding the settlement talks, although some reports suggest that certain firms have already settled their caseloads; a global settlement is reportedly near but not yet finalized.

June 19

A study published in JAMA Surgery found that patients undergoing robotic hernia repair surgery are more likely to experience hernia recurrence within 10 years compared to traditional methods.

June 13

The Bard MDL is somewhat quiet, with rumors of confidential settlements with some law firms. Judge Sargus expects a settlement update soon, and may remand cases to district courts if no hernia mesh settlement is reached.

June 11

A Michigan man filed a new Covidien hernia mesh lawsuit alleging defects in the Symbotex Composite Mesh implanted in 2018 and 2021, and his wife has also brought a loss of consortium claim.

June 3

The Bard Hernia Mesh MDL saw 640 new cases filed in May, bringing the total to 22,896 cases. Lawyers are filing more cases in anticipation of a potential hernia mesh settlement.

May 23

The Covidien MDL has been delayed eight months due to discovery issues, with impotant deadlines now set for December 2024 and 2025. The plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery was denied, which further slowed the process.

May 1

In April, 583 new cases were added to the Bard hernia mesh MDL, increasing the total to 22,256 pending cases and demonstrating a continued influx of claims.

The Covidien MDL now has 1,081 pending cases. Plaintiffs allege that the polyester used in Covidien’s hernia mesh is more brittle and prone to mechanical failure than Bard’s polypropylene, which may strengthen Covidien cases. A hernia mesh settlement is anticipated after Bard reaches one.

April 11

The Covidien hernia mesh MDL has set important deadlines for corporate discovery, expert disclosures, and mediation. A trial selection deadline is now scheduled for May 2025.

April 1

Another 411 new cases were added to the Bard hernia mesh MDL, marking the largest monthly increase in the last six months, with the total now at 21,673 pending cases.

March 26

The second day of mediation for the Bard hernia mesh cases took place, though a hernia mesh settlement seems unlikely. The court is expected to provide an update on the progress of the mediation.

March 22

A New Jersey jury ruled that LifeCell was not at fault in a lawsuit over its Strattice mesh, marking the company’s first win in a jurisdiction with multiple pending cases.

March 19

Hernia mesh settlement discussions are ongoing, with plaintiffs pushing for higher compensation. Bard is also interested in settling, but so far, no agreement has been reached.

March 16

A mediation session is planned for March 25-26, 2024, to resolve the Bard hernia mesh MDL. If no Bard hernia mesh settlement is reached, the case will move forward with the possibility of being remanded for further litigation.

March 1

The Covidien MDL judge ordered the release of key complaint files to speed up the discovery process. A bellwether trial is expected in 2025, with important deadlines set for later in 2024.

February 19

A mediation session is set for early March 2024 to resolve the Bard hernia mesh litigation.

February 5

The judge canceled the trial in the Bryan case and encouraged the parties to work toward a global settlement. There is still uncertainty about what new developments will finally lead to an agreement.

February 3

The next trial in the MDL is Bryan’s case, where he alleges that a 3DMax hernia mesh implant has caused him chronic and severe pain. The court dismissed his strongest claims, including failure to warn and emotional distress, but is still considering negligence and punitive damages.

February 1 Plaintiffs are urging faster progress in hernia mesh lawsuits by calling for a new Case Management Order that would send cases back to state courts. They propose grouping trials into large batches to speed up the process and ensure timely resolutions for everyone involved. The request was denied.

2023

December 5

Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon settled 224 lawsuits in a Georgia MDL. Following the settlement, they filed a joint motion to dismiss the cases without admitting liability, aiming to avoid prolonged litigation.

November 21

The fourth bellwether trial in the Bard hernia mesh MDL is scheduled for April 8, 2024. In this case, Bryan alleges that complications from the 3DMax hernia mesh, such as mesh deformation and chronic pain, have significantly affected his life.

November 9

In the Stinson hernia mesh trial, the jury awarded $500,000 to the plaintiff. While this is a significant win for plaintiffs in the MDL, it is somewhat lower than previous verdicts.

November 8

During the Stinson trial, both sides presented expert witnesses, and they jointly proposed a single damages verdict form to reduce juror confusion and prevent double recoveries.

September 23

The Covidien MDL is moving slowly, with trials set for early 2025. This timetable may push Covidien toward a settlement and affect other hernia mesh lawsuits.

June 23

The MDL judge refused Bard’s request to swap out two hernia mesh bellwether cases, despite Bard’s claim they were too strong. The judge decided to keep the original cases moving forward.

June 8

The Covidien MDL judge will conduct a “Science Day” on June 14, 2023, so both sides can explain the complex issues involved. The MDL now includes over 440 cases.

June 1

Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon (its subsidiary) settled 161 hernia mesh lawsuits. A joint motion to dismiss was filed, covering all claims, counterclaims, and cross-claims.

January 18

The C.R. Bard hernia mesh MDL grew by 176 new cases, reaching 18,403. Many hernia mesh lawsuit plaintiffs hope for a settlement before the next bellwether trial in May 2023.

2022

November 17

The Bard hernia mesh MDL has grown to nearly 18,000 cases. With another bellwether trial set for February, there’s mounting pressure on Bard to negotiate a settlement.

October 28

At a status conference, it was revealed that 170 Covidien cases are pending in federal court, with another 5,700 in state courts in Massachusetts. Plaintiffs strongly opposed a proposed discovery plan, leading to disputes.

September 16

The Atrium hernia mesh MDL in New Hampshire is up to 3,308.

September 9

The Bard Hernia Mesh MDL trial in Stinson v. C.R. Bard is set for February 21, 2023. Previous trials had mixed outcomes, creating pressure for Bard to propose fair settlements rather than go through another trial.

August 29

A jury in Rhode Island awarded $4.8 million in the Trevino case. They ruled that Bard’s Ventralex hernia mesh had a defective design and lacked adequate risk warnings.

August 27

The jury was deliberating in the state court case, Trevino v. Bard, held in Rhode Island Superior Court.

August 26

A mediator for the settlement was named in the C.R. Bard hernia mesh MDL, marking a key step toward a possible global settlement by the end of 2022.

August 24

In the new Covidien hernia mesh MDL, Judge Patti B. Saris held the first status conference. The MDL, formed in June, now has 90 cases pending, and the court plans to establish a leadership committee and lay out a discovery schedule moving forward.

August 4

C.R. Bard used Pro-fax 6523 plastic resin in the hernia mesh, even though supplier LyondellBasell warned it wasn’t safe for permanent use in the body. This revelation may influence the ongoing hernia mesh class action lawsuits and affect the direction of the C.R. Bard MDL.

July 29

There are now four hernia mesh MDLs, with the most recent targeting Covidien’s Parietex hernia patch. As of July 2022, 85 plaintiffs allege that defects in the patch’s absorbable barrier and polyester fibers caused it to fail or migrate.

July 12

In the C.R. Bard Milanesi case, a $255,000 verdict was awarded, but both the defense and plaintiffs moved to overturn it. The MDL judge denied both motions

July 7

Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. denied C.R. Bard’s request for a “Lone Pine.” This order would have required plaintiffs to submit additional, extensive evidence. He ruled that the plaintiffs had already provided enough proof to support their claims.

May 28

The Strattice hernia mesh lawsuit judge set guidelines for preserving and testing evidence such as explanted mesh and tissue samples. This aims to avoid the difficulties seen in earlier hernia mesh MDLs.

May 24

Following the $255,000 verdict in the Milanesi case against C.R. Bard, both parties filed motions contesting the outcome. The plaintiffs requested another trial to address damages, while Bard asserted that the plaintiffs failed to prove the defective mesh or establish causation.

April 15

In the second bellwether trial for Bard mesh cases (Milanesi), the plaintiff won and received a $255,000 verdict.

2021

December

Atrium settled 3,000 hernia mesh lawsuits for a total of $66 million over issues with their C-Qur hernia mesh product.

September 29

The second bellwether case—Milanesi—is scheduled for January 10, 2022.

September 9

The first bellwether trial in the C.R. Bard hernia mesh litigation ended with a surprise victory for Bard. A federal court jury in Dayton, OH, ruled for the defendants on all claims. This left plaintiff Steven Johns with no compensation.

October 14

On October 14, 2021, the New Jersey court system merged the Strattice mesh lawsuits into a Multi-County Litigation (MCL), and a parallel consolidated case is also ongoing in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

June 10

The third and fourth bellwether cases were chosen for the Bard MDL case.

April 20

Bellwether for Bard MDL was pushed back.

2020

November 23

Because of COVID, Bard MDL bellwether was rescheduled for April 19, 2021.

October 14

The first bellwether case in Bard MDL has been tentatively rescheduled to January 7, 2021.

Jan 4

The first bellwether case was selected for the Bard hernia mesh MDL: Johns v. C.R. Bard et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-01509, scheduled for September 9, 2020. The second bellwether case was chosen and will be Milanesi et al. v. C.R. Bard et al., Case No. 2:18- cv-01320.

2019

December 12

According to CMO 23, the first bellwether trial for Bard MDL is scheduled to begin on May 11, 2020.

2018

November 20

The judge in the Bard case explains in CMO 10 how bellwether trials will be chosen and outlines discovery procedures. The first bellwether trial is anticipated to begin on May 8th, 2020.

September 19

CMO 3 appoints Plaintiff’s Steering Committee for Bard MDL.

August 2018

The largest hernia mesh MDL has been established in the Southern District of Ohio, combining lawsuits over Bard polypropylene mesh for faster resolution.

2017

December 2017

Thousands of cases against Atrium Medical’s C-Qur mesh are consolidated into an MDL in the District of New Hampshire.

thousands of hernia mesh claims have been filed against manufacturers

Hernia Mesh Settlement Estimations

If you’re dealing with injuries or complications from a faulty hernia mesh, you may be wondering how much your case is worth.

What Is the Average Hernia Mesh Payout?

There’s no set or average hernia mesh lawsuit payout as each case varies significantly in terms of facts and circumstances. The amount can fluctuate based on several factors that lawyers, hernia mesh manufacturers, and courts spend considerable time evaluating to determine fair compensation.

What Factors Affect Hernia Mesh Settlement Amounts?

Several critical aspects influencing settlement figures include:

  • Severity of Injuries: How severe the complications arising from the defective mesh are plays a significant role. Issues like chronic and severe pain, infections, or requiring additional surgeries significantly impact settlement amounts.
  • Medical Costs: All past and future medical expenses related to treating serious injuries caused by a failed hernia mesh surgery can be obtained, including the cost of hospital stays, hernia repair surgeries, and medication.
  • Impact on Plaintiff’s Life: The impact of the injuries on the plaintiff’s quality of life—encompassing both their physical and emotional well-being—is another important factor in determining settlement values. This includes evaluating how much the hernia mesh injury has altered daily activities, diminished enjoyment of the plaintiff’s life, and caused chronic pain and suffering.
  • Strength of Evidence: Solid evidence showcasing the defendant’s liability significantly affects settlement outcomes. If the plaintiff’s hernia mesh lawyers can show strong evidence that clearly establishes a direct link between the hernia mesh and complications experienced, this can compel defendants to agree to higher settlements.
  • Bellwether Trial Verdicts: Bellwether trial verdicts are important as they serve as test cases used to predict the outcome of similar legal actions in a larger group of lawsuits. These trials provide valuable insights into how juries may respond to evidence and arguments, thus influencing negotiations and settlement amounts in subsequent cases involving similar claims. If bellwether trials result in substantial awards for the plaintiffs, it can encourage defendants to offer higher settlements in an effort to resolve pending cases more efficiently and avoid riskier jury determinations.

Who Can File a Hernia Mesh Implant Claim?

To be eligible to file a hernia mesh lawsuit, certain criteria must be met. These include:

  • Underwent hernia repair surgery involving a mesh implant on or after January 1, 2006.
  • Suffering from serious complications such as adhesions, hernia recurrence, intestinal blockage, migration of the mesh implant to other parts of the body, perforation of organs or tissues, or significant hernia mesh infection occurring more than 30 days after the original hernia surgery date.
  • Having revision surgery or being advised by a medical professional that you require additional surgeries due to complications stemming from the initial surgical mesh implant.

If you meet the above criteria and are one of the many hernia mesh victims suffering from complications from a hernia mesh implant, it may be time to consider taking legal action to seek compensation for the distress and financial burden caused by these medical devices.

Has Anyone Received a Hernia Mesh Settlement?

Multiple plaintiffs have received hernia mesh settlements or court judgments in hernia mesh lawsuits, with varying amounts awarded based on the severity of their injuries and the complexities of each case:

C.R. Bard Kugel Settlement

A significant settlement was reached when C.R. Bard settled approximately 2,600 state and federal lawsuits involving its Kugel hernia patch for $184 million in 2011. This large settlement highlights the widespread impact of defective hernia mesh products in multiple jurisdictions.

Milanese Case

In the Milanese case involving Bard’s hernia mesh, the plaintiff successfully received a verdict of $255,000 at the conclusion of the hernia mesh litigation

Trevino Case

On August 29, 2022, a Rhode Island jury awarded $4.8 million in the Trevino case after ruling that Bard’s Ventralex hernia mesh was defectively designed and lacked proper risk warnings. This verdict underscores the serious consequences of inadequate product safety.

Stinson Case

In the Stinson hernia mesh trial on November 9, 2023, the jury awarded $500,000 to the plaintiff. Although this win is significant, it is somewhat lower than some previous verdicts and lower than what was expected.

Many hernia mesh settlement amounts remain undisclosed, and despite these notable examples, most of these cases still need resolution, leaving many injured plaintiffs waiting for justice.

Defendants in Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

The hernia mesh lawsuits have brought legal action against several notable hernia mesh manufacturers due to issues stemming from their hernia mesh products. The key ones involved are:

  • Ethicon: Ethicon is at the forefront of these legal battles. Ethicon lawsuits suggest their meshes were defectively designed, leading to severe complications for patients.
  • C.R. Bard: C.R. Bard hernia mesh lawsuits allege the company failed to adequately test its devices for safety and effectiveness before they hit the market, causing undue harm.
  • Covidien: Covidien is another one of the active hernia mesh MDLs, with plaintiffs alleging their manufacturing and distribution of hernia mesh products have caused severe injuries.
  • Atrium Medical Corporation: A key player in the hernia mesh litigation, Atrium Medical Corp faces allegations similar to its counterparts. The Atrium hernia mesh MDL lawsuits claim the hernia mesh products had significant design flaws or insufficient safety testing, leading to adverse reactions such as infections, organ damage, and the need for additional surgeries.

Other Potential Defendants

In addition to Bard and other hernia mesh manufacturers, other parties could potentially be held liable in hernia mesh lawsuits due to their various roles in either misleading consumers or directly contributing to patient injuries.

Potential defendants may include:

  • Marketing Agencies: If a marketing agency fails to properly communicate the potential side effects and risks associated with hernia mesh, they might bear some liability. This is particularly true if it can be shown that patients would not have used these hernia mesh products had they been fully informed.
  • Distribution or Transport Companies: Entities responsible for distributing or transporting hernia mesh play a crucial part in ensuring product integrity until it reaches medical facilities. If their handling practices damaged the product causing hernia mesh failures post-implantation, they could face legal actions for their negligence resulting in harm.
  • Medical Practitioners: In a hernia mesh case where physician error or negligence directly leads to complications related to hernia mesh implants, the physicians themselves can be held accountable.
  • Hospitals and Medical Facilities: The hospital or medical facility where the hernia repair surgery was conducted may also face legal responsibilities in some cases.

What Is the Hernia Mesh Lawsuit About?

Hernia repair, like an inguinal hernia repair, often involves using a synthetic mesh, which is intended to support the affected area. The hernia mesh lawsuit pertains to the serious medical complications experienced by some patients due to a defective hernia mesh product.

Since the early 2000s, Bard and various other hernia mesh manufacturers have introduced numerous types of these meshes into the market. However, there have been multiple instances where these devices have had severe design flaws, leading to adverse health consequences, including severe chronic pain and often further hernia repair surgery.

Ultimately, the hernia mesh lawsuits claim the manufacturers of these medical devices failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about the risk of severe hernia mesh complications associated with their use.

Is There a Hernia Mesh Class Action?

There are currently four separate hernia mesh class action Multidistrict Litigations (MDLs) concerning hernia meshes. Each hernia mesh class action MDL focuses on claims against a different manufacturer responsible for producing the defective hernia mesh implants.

The lawsuits have been consolidated to efficiently process thousands of individual hernia mesh cases. They have been brought forward by affected patients with similar hernia mesh injuries stemming from a specific manufacturer’s hernia mesh defects.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Statute of Limitations

The deadline to file a hernia mesh lawsuit, known as the statute of limitations, differs in each state. This timeframe is typically determined by when you first became aware of the medical complications associated with your hernia mesh implant.

In Illinois, the statute of limitations (735 ILCS 5/13-213) for a hernia mesh lawsuit is two years from the time you discover adverse effects linked to defective hernia mesh.

However, Illinois adheres to a statute of repose for hernia mesh cases concerning failings in these devices, which is 12 years from when the device was implanted. This means that after 12 years, no matter when you learn of the complications, you will no longer be eligible to file a surgical mesh lawsuit.

How to File a Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

To file a hernia mesh lawsuit, there are several steps required to ensure you lay a strong foundation for your case.

Schedule a Free Consultation to Verify Your Eligibility

Initially, you should verify your eligibility for legal action by obtaining a free case evaluation from an experienced hernia mesh lawyer. This will involve reviewing the specific details and determining if it’s likely that a defective hernia mesh was the cause of your severe injuries or complications. Contact Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers to determine your eligibility.

Gather Evidence

To substantiate your hernia mesh claim, it’s essential to gather evidence. This typically includes medical records, expert testimony, and any other supporting documents that serve as proof of the hernia mesh injuries suffered and linking them to the product.

File Your Lawsuit

Next, you will work with your hernia mesh lawsuit attorneys to file the claim and ensure your hernia mesh lawsuit is filed within the appropriate statute of limitations.

Negotiate a Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Settlement

Your hernia lawsuit attorneys will attempt to negotiate a settlement with the manufacturer. If a settlement can be reached, the hernia mesh case can be resolved at this point without going through a trial.

Trial if Necessary

During the hernia mesh trial, your lawyer will provide evidence and witness testimony supporting your claim. The judge or jury will then decide whether you are entitled to any damages based on the presented facts.

What Makes Us the Best Hernia Mesh Lawyers for Your Case

Jonathan Rosenfeld Personal Injury Lawyer

Our team of experienced hernia mesh lawyers is ready to guide you through the complex process of filing a lawsuit, leveraging our expertise and resources to advocate for your rights and achieve justice. By working with our hernia mesh lawyers, you are securing legal representation and dedicated advocates who work tirelessly towards ensuring you receive fair compensation and justice.

Here’s how Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers can help.

Assessing Your Case

We start by offering a free, comprehensive evaluation of your case to determine its viability. Our legal team will review the specifics around your situation ——including when and where the hernia mesh surgery happened and what complications you faced afterward—ensuring we establish a solid foundation for your claim.

Building a Strong Case

Once we decide to move forward, our lawyers will meticulously prepare your hernia mesh case. We gather all necessary medical records, documentation of complications or injuries related to the hernia mesh, and opinions from medical professionals proving the link between your suffering and the hernia mesh implant.

Support and Communication

Our legal team believes open and transparent communication forms the backbone of a successful attorney-client relationship. Throughout the entirety of your hernia mesh lawsuit process, we ensure you are never left in the dark. We provide regular updates on how your case is progressing and are available to answer any questions or concerns you may have.

Level the Playing Field

Ultimately, facing large manufacturers with immense resources can be close to impossible for an individual. Our involvement evens out this disparity by bringing legal expertise and resources to the table. We are deeply familiar with the tactics used by these large corporations and possess the strategy and knowledge required to counteract them effectively.

Are Hernia Mesh Attorneys Expensive?

We understand the concern about finances when dealing with hernia mesh injuries and considering filing a lawsuit with the help of hernia mesh attorneys. However, hiring a hernia mesh attorney doesn’t have to be financially draining. At Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, we operate on a contingency fee basis.

This means that we do not charge any upfront or hourly costs. Instead, our legal fees are an agreed-upon percentage deducted from any recovery in your case, the hernia mesh lawsuit settlement figure, or compensation awarded at trial. If you don’t get paid, we don’t get paid.

Damages a Hernia Mesh Attorney Can Help You Recover

A skilled hernia mesh attorney can assist you in pursuing a range of damages to ensure you are adequately compensated for suffered injuries. Here’s an overview:

  • Pain and Suffering
  • Medical Bills
  • Lost Income
  • Mental Anguish

For cases involving wrongful death claims linked with defective hernia mesh, you may be able to recover damages such as funeral and burial expenses, medical bills, loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, loss of consortium, loss of moral support and education the deceased person would have provided for their children, and mental suffering, grief, and sorrow. The exact type and amount of compensation you could be entitled to is dependent on your specific situation. The best way to determine this is to speak with our wrongful death attorneys in Chicago.

damage compensation is awarded in hernia mesh claims

Why Are People Filing Hernia Mesh Lawsuits?

The hernia mesh MDLs originate from individuals who have suffered serious injuries and complications following surgeries where hernia mesh was implanted.

Most of these claimants assert that the manufacturers failed to adequately disclose or actively concealed risks associated with problematic designs, which in some cases led to mesh failure and serious complications, necessitating revision hernia mesh surgery.

Claims also consist of allegations such as defective design, manufacturing defects contributing to erosion or mesh migration issues, and medical malpractice.

If you have suffered complications from a hernia mesh implant, our product liability lawyers in Chicago can offer the guidance and advocacy needed during this difficult time.

What Is a Hernia Mesh?

A hernia mesh, often referred to as surgical mesh, is a medical device utilized in the repair of damaged tissue due to hernias. They are typically positioned over the affected area along your upper stomach region, abdominal wall, or groin during hernia repair surgeries and firmly affixed using stitches.

The design incorporates numerous pores, allowing for bodily tissue growth through and around it, providing enhanced support as muscles recover from treatment.

Common Hernia Mesh Complications

As stated, hernia mesh implants have been associated with a range of complications that can significantly impact a patient’s health and quality of life. The following are some common examples:

  • Cancer
  • Chronic pain
  • Surgical mesh failure
  • Groin/testicular pain
  • Infection
  • Seromas
  • Recurrence of hernia, leading to another hernia mesh surgery
  • Abdominal pain
  • Bowel obstruction
  • Adhesion, where hernia mesh implant attaches itself to internal tissues
  • Hernia mesh migration, potentially causing serious internal issues.
  • Perforation of tissues/organs.
  • Erosion Of medical device

Individuals experiencing these issues should consider legal recourse to address their suffering and recover damages.

Are Hernia Meshes Recalled?

Across various manufacturers, there have been many recalls of hernia mesh products due to the discovery of defects posing serious risks to patients.

ACell and Sofradim Hernia Mesh Recalls

  • ACell recalled its Gentrix Surgical Matrix Thick on March 21, 2019, due to failure to meet tensile strength specifications.
  • Sofradim issued Class 2 recalls for its Versatex Monofilament Mesh, announced on April 26, 2018, after reports of abdominal hernia recurrence.

Atrium Hernia Mesh Recalls

  • Atrium Medical Corporation recalled hernia mesh products—its ProLite Mesh, posted on February 23, 2018, for incorrect labeling affecting 60 units, distributed only to Spain.
  • Atrium’s recalled hernia mesh devices—their C-QUR products—posted on August 9, 2013, due to packaging issues. These products had worldwide distribution.

Bard Mesh Implant Recalls

  • Composix and Ventralight models were recalled in 2014 due to potential sterility issues caused by packaging problems.
  • Ventralight ST Mesh models were recalled in 2012 for mislabeling of package sizes.
  • Soft Mesh Patch was recalled in 2011 for containing a different size patch than indicated.
  • Ventralex ST Medium Circle (with Strap Hernia Patch) was recalled in 2011 for incorrect packaging and identification.
  • Preshaped Mesh, Ventrio Hernia Patch, and 3D Max Mesh models were recalled between 2009 and 2011 due to mislabeling issues.

Covidien Recalls

  • Parietex Hydrophilic Anatomical Mesh was recalled in 2021 for mislabeling the hernia mesh device’s size.
  • Parietex Composite Parastomal Mesh was recalled in 2018 due to reports of mesh failure and hernia recurrence requiring additional hernia surgery.
  • AutoSuture Surgipro Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Clear was recalled in 2011 for compromised sterility due to a breach in the sterile barrier.

Ethicon Recalls

  • Proceed Surgical Mesh faced multiple recalls from 2005 to 2014, with over 18,000 units affected mainly due to compromised sterility.
  • In 2020, a recall of 15 units from a single lot was issued after a hair was found inside the primary packaging.
  • In 2014, 223 units were recalled due to an incomplete seal on the packaging that could compromise sterility and lead to delamination.
  • In 2010, 87 hernia mesh devices were recalled for potential delamination.

Contact an Experienced Hernia Mesh Lawyer Today!

Jonathan Rosenfeld, Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer

If you or a loved one has been impacted by complications from a hernia mesh implant, it’s essential to seek experienced legal counsel. At Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, we specialize in handling cases like yours and are dedicated to fighting for the compensation you deserve.

Contact us today for a free consultation where a skilled hernia mesh lawyer will evaluate your case and discuss available options with no obligation. Call us now at (888) 424-5757 or fill out our contact form to discuss the next steps with a personal injury attorney in Chicago.

Specific Cases We Handle

Resources: [1] United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, [2] Bloomberg Law, [3] PR Newswire [4] Consumernotice.org, [5] FDA, [6] FDA, [7] FDA, [8] FDA, [9] FDA, [10] FDA, [11] FDA, [12] FDA, [13] FDA, [14] FDA, [15] FDA

All content undergoes thorough legal review by experienced attorneys, including Jonathan Rosenfeld. With 25 years of experience in personal injury law and over 100 years of combined legal expertise within our team, we ensure that every article is legally accurate, compliant, and reflects current legal standards.

Client Reviews

“Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of...

Ethan Armstrong

“Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of...

Giulia

“This lawyer really helped me get compensation for my motorcycle accident case. I know there is no way that I could have gotten anywhere near the amount that Mr. Rosenfeld was able to get to settle my case...

Daniel Kaim

Get in Touch

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 No Fees Unless We Win
  3. 3 Available 24/7

Fill out the contact form or call us at (888) 424-5757 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message

Disclaimer